Populace, Production: Indian Economics

November 25, 2010 By Leave a Comment
Downtown Mumbai from Nariman Point.
Image via Wikipedia

There is one simple rule of finance, one truth that must be remembered – there can be no economy without a populace to guide it. The world of profits and dollars will crumble without the masses (unable to sustain itself, unable to even try). Men must offer themselves instead to the market; stimulating it with their efforts, their time. And this has inspired the belief that nations with waning populations will soon fall, unable to meet the demands of money. Those with always evolving numbers, however, are poised instead to rise. Their relief will be in their workers and their countries will be transformed into successes.

And this has led Indian economics to become one of the most anticipated processes throughout the world. With its spectacular climb through the financial hierarchy, it has defined itself to great potential – and this must be attributed to its impressive population.

Through this a wealth of rewards has been achieved:

One: Stronger workforce. The purpose of any market is to be filled with goods and services. These cannot be offered, however, with a dwindling public. India does not suffer from such an affliction. It is among the most densely populated countries in the world, resting only behind China.

Two: Job stimulation. When there is an abundance of employees, there must then be an abundance of positions for them to take. Government programs have been initiated to generate placements and create jobs – which offers a more reliable economy.

Three: Experts available. No market can survive without the knowledge – and experience – of those who are specialists within their fields. With such a massive amount of workers available, the chances for finding these specialists increases dramatically. There can be the selection of the best, rather than the convenient. And this helps to brand efforts worthy and wanted by the public.

The numbers do not deceive – their success is instead proven again and again.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Filed Under: Economic Growth Tagged With: , , , , , , ,

The Agricultural Movement: Indian Economics

November 23, 2010 By Leave a Comment
Tropical rainforest, Fatu Hiva Island, Marques...
Image via Wikipedia

The world is shaped to weakening resources, the obscuring of horizon lines in the wake of modern progress – cities have consumed all of their once precious miles, replacing earth to stone, churning water into electricity. The consequence has been a force of imports, a seek of open air and untouched boundaries. The most powerful nations are dependent now on those once deemed lacking in all finance or potential; and the balance of an economy is beginning to shift because of it. Money is being exchanged for agriculture. Reputations are being formed in the trade of oil and forestry. And India is rising to an undeniable presence among all countries.

The principles of Indian economics are easily defined: they are settled happily within a free market, allowing for quick exchanges of resources between foreign lands, the bartering of Arcadian needs for wealth. No other nation in the world can match this – and such a claim has many confused. Surely there are continents that can meet these high standards? Surely there are cities that can generate the necessary agriculture?

There aren’t.

India is the seventh largest land mass – and this translates to an abundance of natural resources. Forests, farmlands and more are found in excess there; which allows exporting to be a simple thing. The country is ranked among the world’s most influential traders. Its production of wheat, timber, dairy products and tobacco are found consistently at the top of the economic chain. Few can even attempt to rival the quantities that can be provided – and the majority do not even try. They instead seek to use these resources to soothe the strain their own populations are feeling.

It is a vital exchange and India is profiting from it. With the coupling of their always expanding population and the output of agricultural, they have become a dominating force. And this should only continue throughout the years to come.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Filed Under: Economic Growth Tagged With: , , , , , , ,

Protectionism, Defined: Indian Economics

November 15, 2010 By Leave a Comment
Kamal Nath - World Economic Forum Annual Meeti...
Image by World Economic Forum via Flickr

In the wake of independence there is always call for change – the economy is not immune to this, forced always to be revised; its former conditions abandoned and its former rules shaped new. When India claimed itself free of British dominance in 1857 it was left with overwhelming challenges: none more desperate than revitalizing a waning market. Money was a scarce creature, hidden among the failing infrastructures and effects of colonization. There seemed to be no way to secure dollars beyond taming access to the outside world and devoting all energy to a nation itself.

And so the protectionism reforms began – and the the results were not entirely expected.

Defined simply, protectionism is the policy of limiting all importing and exporting within both a specific country and the ones that surround it. The government controls all wares, demanding tariffs and quotas to ensure that there is no waste of resources – and no temptation to send these resources to outside nations. The area instead becomes insular, relying purely on itself to avoid the influences (and possible dominations) of others. This is meant to shield a population from being too controlled by those who cannot understand them

The principle, when first glanced, seems reasonable. With India reeling still from foreign invasions, it was deemed wise to avoid all unnecessary contact with the world. The country was instead to support itself, trying to regain all that had been lost.

This did not occur, however, in the way that had been anticipated. Protectionism (initiated from 1947 to 1991) helped to secure Indian economics but it did not promote growth or radical rewards. The market was still slow, suffering from a loss of free trade. There was stability but not profit. And it soon became clear that the policy would have to change to match both the times and the needs of a nation.

The open market was then formed and the advantages were immediately clear.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Filed Under: Economic Growth Tagged With: , , , , , , ,

Stock Trading Talk Replaces the Economic Journal

August 21, 2010 By Leave a Comment

It’s a sad but true commentary on the world when music video stations are the leading source of information for most people and those who don’t visit those stations get the majority of their information from movies and the sports pages. This is a real problem. What used to come from good discourse and great minds thinking about intense problems has gone the way of the dinosaur as we are in the midst of an age dominated by fast results and less deep thoughts.

There was once a time when the Economic Journal was one of the most recognizable and most well known academic journals in the country. It was started in 1891 with the desire to advance the world’s understanding of economics and make breakthroughs in the field. It was one of the better journals in all of the world.

It today’s world, the Economic Journal is still respected but not read nearly as much as it should be because the priorities of people are different. There is no longer a great want to make the world better — just a sense that talking about economics would be like trying to reinvent the wheel and that there are no advancements people can contribute to. Now, the extent of the casual economics discussion is relegated to stock trading and talking about the ills of the free market but never discussing the things needed to make repairs to the broken system when everyone recognizes it’s broken.

The Economic Journal is more than just a great publication. It is a symbol of the good things that come from intelligent people sharing their thoughts on the world. It’s a shame it isn’t more prevalent nowadays but it’s not that kind of a generation. At least there is always the Economic Journal.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Filed Under: Economic Growth Tagged With: , , ,

Indian Economics: Free Market Principles

April 28, 2010 By Leave a Comment
Planet's cheapest car, the Nano xj.
Image via Wikipedia

The world of finance is often baffling. There are endless terms and technicalities to recall; each with its own subtle variations and not so subtle demands. The common man is often left frustrated by the many meanings, the overwhelming explanations. There can be no understanding of them, it is assumed. There can be no method within this monetary madness. Each attempt to find one fails – spectacularly. And, when the notion of the free market is tossed about, most feign interest and try to shield their own confusion.

That confusion is not necessary, however.

When wishing to learn of Indian economics, individuals must also learn of the free market. This does not have to be the terror it has often been deemed, however: a force of dollars and their potentials, the too hectic trade of wares. Too many believe these principles cannot be simplified for the masses. But they can – and from this can come an understanding of how a country has risen among the world powers. For foreign traders who work with companies such as UFX Markets Trading, know more about the state of the foreign economies, which commodities are in demand, and are even using online trading methods for convenience.

Simply defined, the free market principles that guide India are ones lacking the expected restrictions. The government does not intervene with importing and exporting (beyond the creation of necessary laws). Instead trade is dominated by the practical philosophy of supply and demand. Businesses can create their own policies, prices and economic decisions. There is no regulation or forced costs. Instead the market is shaped by individuals and their choices.

This allows for India to offer competitive rates among the world – which has made it appealing to outside nations, each wishing to take advantage of the stable prices and plentiful resources. Through a free market, the country has been able to grow exponentially within a matter of years (since 1991, specifically). It is now a challenger to the expectations of others; and it is constantly succeeding in shattering those expectations.

The free market concept does not have to inspire concern. It should instead inspire envy.

Filed Under: Economic Growth Tagged With: , , , , , , ,